The Sound Strike

Background Arizona

19th Century AZ Map

The battles raging in Arizona against immigrants are not typical of racist wedge issues we see from far right wing extremists. In most cases the extremists influence the political system, in Arizona the extremists ARE the political system. A shocking number of Arizona law enforcement officials, politicians, and political demagogues have close connections to organizations that believe diversity in American equals the deterioration of America.

While SB 1070 has been a wake up and rally cry, it is only the latest policy in a State that is embroiled in fuming racial divisions and hateful rhetoric towards Latinos.  In fact, Arizona has a controversial history deep in conquest, war, forced assimilation, racism, and extreme conservative politics.

The following is a brief history of Arizona covering mostly the landmark events that have helped to shape the state’s political ideology and current political context.

Arizona Territory History

Arizona is a land that has been inhabited by Indigenous people for tens of thousands of years. Several native nations inhabited, and claimed areas of Arizona long before the existence of the United States, Spain or Mexico. The current state of Arizona is land stolen from Native Americans at the hands of the cruel and genocidal policies of the Nations of Spain, Mexico and the United States.

Spain Invades: The book American Holocaust by David Standard details the cruel and inhumane manner in which the land of Arizona was stolen and the people of those Native Nations were conquered.

The first Europeans to invade this area were led  by the Spanish Franciscan friar Marcos de Niza with the more aggressive Francisco Coronado arriving soon after.  War in defense of their lands and ways by Native Americans discouraged attempts at settlement until 1598. In that year Spain, with no authority to do so, claimed the land known as Arizona as part of New Spain. For 200 years mission work was used to assimilate and pacify the Native population and the padres worked tirelessly to convert the native population. In 1752 the first fortified city was established at Tubuc and a presidio was established in 1775 at Tucson to help protect Spanish interests in the area.

Mexico Invades: In 1821 Mexico had gained independence from Spain and claimed ownership of what is now Arizona. Mexico itself engaged in fierce battles with Native Americans in the area who continued to fight for autonomy and their way of life. By the late 1820′s the Spanish had deserted most of their outposts in the area and Americans began to pour in looking for land.

USA Steals Arizona from Mexico: After the 1848 United States war with Mexico the US stole the northern part of Arizona from Mexico and later ‘bought’ the remainder of current Arizona in the Gadsden Purchase.  In 1852 Arizona became part of the territory of New Mexico In 1861 at Mesilla and at Tucson the Territory declared itself as the Confederate Territory of Arizona and effectively join the Confederacy to help preserve slavery of Blacks only to be defeated by the North.  On December 29, 1863 Arizona was established as a separate territory and part of the United States.

Arizona fights to become a State to preserve Slavery: During the Civil war the South (Confederate) added what it called the “The Territory of Arizona” to fight to preserve slavery. After the Civil War Arizona attempted to become a state in 1891 but was rejected by Congress until Arizona could prove its willingness to suppress its ethnic cultural diversity.  Finally in 1912 Arizona enter the union.

‘Indian Wars’ and the Wild West

Two famous Indian Chiefs Cochise and Geronimo were natives of Arizona and carried on guerilla (small war) warfare within Arizona against the encroaching white settlers until Geronimo surrendered in 1886 ending the Apache Wars. White settlers were given free land by the Federal government to accelerate the war on native peoples. The fierce fighting gave Arizona a reputation as one of the most cruel and outlaw violence in the nation.

Arizona was also home to the Phoenix Indian School, a federal institution designed to assimilate native children into mainstream culture. Children were often enrolled into these schools against the wishes of their parents and families. Attempts to suppress native identities included forcing the children to cut their hair and take on western names.

Brigham Young sent Mormons to Arizona in the mid-to-late 19th century. They stole land and created Mesa, Snowflake, Heber, Safford and other towns. They also settled in the Phoenix Valley (or “Valley of the Sun”), Tempe, Prescott, and other areas.

During the Mexican Revolution from 1910 to 1920, several battles were fought in Mexican towns just across the border from Arizona border settlements. Throughout the revolution, Arizonans were enlisting in one of several armies fighting in Mexico. agreement on US soil between United States and Mexican forces. The battle resulted in an American victory.

Arizona Rounds of Germans, Italians, and Japanese during WWI: Arizona was the site of German and Italian POW or concentration camps during World War II and Japanese US-resident ‘internment-concentration’ camps. Because of wartime fears of Japanese invasion of the west coast, all Japanese residents in western Arizona were required to reside in the war camps. The camps were abolished after World War II. The Phoenix area camp site was purchased after the war by the Maytag family and is the location for the Phoenix Zoo. A Japanese American internment camp was located on Mount Lemmon, just outside of the state’s southeastern city of Tucson. Another POW Camp was located near the Gila River  in eastern Yuma County.

Arizona becomes a favorite retirement spot for older White Americans. Arizona’s population grew tremendously after World War II, in part because of the development of air conditioning, which made the intense summers more comfortable. The 1960s saw the establishment of retirement communities, special age-restricted subdivisions catering exclusively to the needs of senior citizens who wanted to escape the harsh winters of the Midwest and the Northeast. Sun City was one of the first such communities and later Green Valley,  south of Tucson, was another such community and was designed to be a retirement subdivision for Arizona’s teachers.  In addition, Senior citizens who arrive in Arizona each winter and stay only during the winter months are referred to as snowbirds.

Political Shift to the Right: From statehood through the late 1940s, Arizona was primarily dominated by the Democratic Party. After the election of Dwight D. Eiisenhower in 1952 the state has voted consistently Republican in national politics. The Republican Party has since dominated Arizona politics in general. The fast-growing Phoenix and Tucson suburbs became increasingly friendly to Republicans since then. During this time, many “Pinto Democrats,” or conservative Democrats from rural areas, became increasingly willing to support Republicans at the state and national level.

The Goldwater State

In 1960, then US Senator from Arizona Barry Goldwater wrote a book The Conscience of a Conservative which quickly became popular in conservative circles. In 1961, Goldwater told an audience of Atlanta Republicans that “we’re not going to get the negro vote as a block in 1964 and 1968, so we ought to go hunting where the ducks are.” By this statement Goldwater meant the campaign needed to appeal to racist white southern voters who were incensed at the passage of civil rights and the integration of public schools. In 1964 Barry Goldwater’s ran for President largely on the issue of “state’s Rights,” (pretty much against integration).  The Goldwater campaign was a magnet for conservatives.

Goldwater opposed the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Goldwater was the first Republican to win plenty of electoral votes of the Deep South states (Louisiana, Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi, and South Carolina) since Reconstruction. Goldwater’s campaign brought to fruition a prediction by President Johnson that the passage of Civil Rights would turn over the South to Republicans. While Goldwater lost the election he became a magnet for young conservatives and his run for President is largely considered the first mass right wing team building of the “silent majority.” Many of today’s leading conservative political ideas, leaders and activists trace their entrée into politics to the Goldwater campaign. In addition, the Goldwater campaign led the exodus from the Democratic Party of racist, homophobic and xenophobic White Southerners.

Arizona politics are dominated by a longstanding rivalry between its two largest counties, Maricopa County and Pima County–home to Phoenix and Tucson, respectively. The two counties have almost 75 percent of the state’s population and cast almost 80 percent of the state’s vote. They also elect a substantial majority of the state legislature.

Maricopa County is home to almost 60 percent of the state’s population, and most of the state’s elected officials live there. The Sheriff of Maricopa County is the infamous Sheriff Joe Arpaio (See Evil Arpaio page). In contrast, Pima County, home to Tucson, and most of southern Arizona have historically been more Democratic. While.

Arizona Rejects Martin Luther King Jr. Holiday. In 1986 the federal government declared MLK Day as a national holiday; however, states still had this own say in the matter. The holiday failed to make it through the Arizona state legislature, but Governor Bruce Babbitt declared it to be a holiday throughout the state.  One year later, racist Evan Meacham became the governor of the state and rescinded the MLK holiday.

In 1989 The Arizona state legislature again failed passed a proposal for the holiday 1989, with many Whites in Arizona adamantly fighting against the MLK holiday.  In 1989 the Hip Hop group Public Enemy made the classic song regarding Arizona’s shameless refusal to recognize the MLK holiday.

In 1993 the National Football League, under pressure from Civil Rights groups, pulled Arizona from its hosting of the Super Bowl that year. Eventually in 1995, the state finally elected to celebrate MLK Day as a holiday mostly out of fear of further boycotts and its growing reputation as a racist state.

 

The March towards immigrant Hateration

In 2002 under the Bush US Attorney’s office, Kris Kobach wrote a then secret yet damning memo, Inherent Authority (See Link). In that same year President Bush, then Arizona Governor Janet Napolitano and Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio signed first 287(g) program. Soon after Sheriff Evil Arpaio began targeting immigrant street vendors and day laborers for prosecution, arrest, detention and deportation in order to bolster his declining popularity.

In November of 2004 Arizona passed proposition 200 requiring immigrants to show proof of residency when receiving government social services. In 2005 Arizona passes controversial human smuggling law and has its first “Minuto-Man” rally full of skinheads and Nazis.

In 2006 Center For Immigrant Studies published policy paper that became Arpaiotheid’s chief protocol “Enforcement Through Attrition” (See link).  From 2007 to 2010 Arpaio’s Nazi pal Arizona State Senator Russell Pearce worked with Immigration Reform Law Institute (IRLI), the private prison industry, and FAIR to concoct and pass SB 1070. During the debate a rancher in Arizona was found dead near the border and his death was falsely blamed on immigrants without an iota of proof.

In 2008, Arizona passed Proposition 102, an amendment to the state constitution to define marriage as a union of one man and one woman. In 2010, Arizona passed the toughest SB 1070, igniting a fierce debate between supporters and detractors of the law.


  • Paprbckwriter9

    Old white people passed SB1070. Old white people did all of the bad things talked about above here. Old white people will not notice if Rage Against the Machine and Bright Eyes don’t play music in Arizona. Old white people will not change their minds because of The Sound Strike.

    Why not organize visible protest concerts in Arizona and voter registration drives so that we can vote out these clowns in the next election? Remember when Dr. King stayed out the South because of Jim Crow? Oh, wait, that didn’t happen. He marched through every city in the South and forced the racists out of power. Arizona is not South Africa; historically, Arizona has been a more open and accepting state than California (i.e. Chinese Exclusionary Act and Zoot Suit Riots). You’re also leaving out that California also rounded up Asian-Americans during World War II, and certainly in greater numbers than in Arizona. And I think that’s really your problem: you’re ignoring the Georgia immigration law and singling out Arizona. The immigration issue is nationwide; you can’t just put blinders on and think if we fixed Arizona we’d fix everywhere. It’s astonishing how simple-minded you all are. I guess that’s why you’re musicians and not real leaders. Don’t boycott Arizona; invade and march in the streets if you really care. I don’t know why you can’t simply reach out to the people (i.e. young people, who are your fans) who are most likely to support you and show the old white folks what’s up. Your goal’s right, but your strategy is hopelessly wrong and you’re probably setting back real reform by a half-decade or more. It’s sad you’re unable to think critically about your strategy and emulate successful American human rights movements of the past. I wish you weren’t all as closed-minded and short-sighted as the people who passed that hideously law, SB1070. It’s too bad you’re playing right into their hands and are too proud to think twice about your strategy. Don’t abandon us, or else we’ll all move to other states and you’ll be stuck with an old, white, racist bastion.

    Sincerely
    Disappointed and alone in Arizona.

  • Louie84

    Please cease your boycott — you have friends and peers in the liberal bases in AZ cities, and at NAU and ASU and UA, and we already feel so alone and isolated.  We need help!  Come to us!

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_FATOEWBZIS2JJQMUTVTR47XXMU sane contemplation

      Help? Help in what? You make it seem your under marshal law when you’re not. If you want help in spreading the word about SB1070 and how you feel it’s bad, hold a rally. DO something, instead of crying out to people who condemn and punish you, the music lover, because they are politically shaded.

  • Arizona

    I find the Sound Strike to be completely unfair. I am a 19 year old female who lives in Surprise, Arizona. That means I was under the age of 18 when this law was passed. How fair is that? I didn’t get vote and now I will never be able to see some of my favorite bands play live here again because of it. Do you think it’s reasonable for me to drive 8+ hours to California to see My Chemical Romance play live? I am just extremely saddened by this whole protest. Sure, there are problems in Arizona, but what state is perfect? It’s not fair to music fans. We continue to have no voice.

    • Thesoundstrike

      There are thousands of children separated from their parents because of the horror and terror of law enforcement of your state. Sure you had no vote, but you do have a say. In the meantime, we apologize for any inconvenience to you. But the racism and attacks on immigrants are far greater suffering than missing a show. Economic boycotts have been effective tools in the South, South Africa, etc. We hope you understand.

    • Anon

      You wouldn’t have had a choice either way.  This wasn’t something that was up for the public to vote on.  It was something that was passed through the State Legislature.  They’re holding people like us (who didn’t vote for those so-called representatives in the first place) responsible for something that we really had no control over.  It’s completely unfair and ends up only punishing music fans.

      • StevieB

        So you saying this is not a sacrifice you are willing to make for change? The boycott is the only thing stopping these crazies. I know children who have lost their parents. It is horrible. Missing a show is nothing compared to what is happening to families. @anon you only think of yourself.

        • Anon

          Actually, this boycott isn’t doing anything at all to change the situation that you’re referring to, which was my point.  The boycott is not “stopping these crazies”.  Trust me on this.  Not a single thing has changed as a result of this boycott.  What really needs to be done is far more than bands refusing to play shows in the state of Arizona.  Please understand that in order to make changes to the current political climate, we must be involved in the politics of it.  I’m not only thinking of myself.  I’m simply stating that a boycott by bands that the politicians who passed these laws have never even heard of, isn’t going to change a thing, StevieB.  We need to get people to vote.  We need to get people to speak.  We need to get the people of this state truly involved.  

        • Anon

          And another point that I feel needs to be made is that SB1070 has not gone into effect as of yet due to lawsuits that have been filed.  The atrocities that you accuse me of condoning have occurred as a result of enforcement of federal immigration laws.  Will they boycott the entire country as a result?  No.  Of course they won’t.  They refuse to boycott other states that have passed similar immigration laws (also without the public being allowed to vote on them), so why would they try to change the draconian federal regulations?  Doesn’t that seem a little strange to you?  It should.  Please educate yourself before throwing accusations at people that you don’t even know.  Just because someone disagrees with this boycott doesn’t mean that they agree with current immigration law.  

          • Thesoundstrike

            This is an inaccurate statement and a falsehood promoted by the liberal anti-boycott Democratic establishment. 1) Arpaio has said he does not need SB 1070, he is already doing it. Also he is doing it with Obama’s 287(g) and Secure Communities Programs so it is a farce that the Obama Administration is challenging Arizona laws. 2) Arizona is in slight conflict with the federal Governnent precisely because they have created their own laws. Yes they use federal laws, but they also use the 90% of SB 1070 that is in effect and other bills and laws like Prop 200, human smuggling and the ban on ethnic studies.

            Look no one wants fans to pay for what their state is doing. That really sucks, but the sound strike did not call for the boycott and cannot call it off. Actually the only people with the power to call off the boycott is the Arizona government.

          • Anon

            “Liberal anti-boycott Democratic establishment”?  Wow.  I’m not quite sure where you’re going with that.  Before I even speak about the remainder of your statement, Thesoundstrike, I have to ask which statement of mine it is that you’re saying is inaccurate and a falsehood.  The atrocities of the current federal immigration laws that caused huge problems for families here in Arizona long prior to SB1070?  Please do me a favor and research just a bit more about the true history of immigration issues in this state.  Having lived here my entire life, I am well aware of the things that have happened in our communities long before Jan Brewer, Russell Pearce and Joe Arpaio came along.  You are correct that the only people who can change these laws are the Arizona government.  So why not encourage people to be more aware of the issues, to contact their representatives, to vote?   

            Frankly, I’m not anti-boycott.  I simply disagree with this boycott because it doesn’t seem to have taken into account the other states that have passed similar laws.  What about Georgia?  What about Utah?  What about Indiana?  What about Alabama?  What is being done in those states?  No boycott.  If you were serious about making people listen, you would boycott them all.  As of yet, that has not happened and it is my understanding from news articles that I’ve read, that there are no plans to boycott other states.  To me, that seems strange.  It makes me wonder about your dedication to this extremely important human rights issue.  

          • FreddieB112

            The Boycott has cost the State of Arizona over $270M and counting. That does not even count the over 20 conventions and shows cancelled since the CAP study. Not to mention with the exception of LadyChaCha the largest concerts in the country did not go to Arizona. No not the sires chick or hanah montana. The biggest shows were Mana, Shakira, Kanye West / Jay Z, Maroon 5, and Aventura. Look at the ticket sales. Those groups sell out huge arenas. I am from Florida and if it were not for the Texas boycott I am sure these fools here would have tried the same type of stuff. Besides your on this site, so it is working

          • Anon

            Although I’m not sure how to verify the numbers, Freddie, I’ll take your word for it.  I’m glad that you think that the loss of revenue is going to make a difference in changing the law (which, again, has not yet gone into effect).  Hopefully it does.  Maybe then we can get Sound Strike to start doing this in the other states that have passed similar laws that are just as hateful, instead of only singling out Arizona.

            Honestly, though, my being on this site isn’t proof of anything except that I’m frustrated that they’re not making this a nationwide effort.  I keep hoping that I’ll come here some day and see that they have changed their minds and decided to make this a real boycott.  Still not seeing that, though.  It’s sad, really.

  • itisntwhatitisnt

    I don’t understand how California, the worst U.S. state in terms of
    corruption, failed economy, and “stolen land”, has any right to
    criticize Arizona. The 2-million plus ex-Californians that have made the exodus to AZ over the last 2 decades have helped create a lot of this problem, as they make up a huge part of the voting population here (in addition to driving housing costs up/wages down and bringing little industry with them).

    Also, your “historian” needs basic grammar and citation lessons, and possibly a relocation out of fantasy-land. Saying that the Mormons drove the native people out of Snowflake made me laugh so hard I almost spit coffee on my screen. Really?

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_FATOEWBZIS2JJQMUTVTR47XXMU sane contemplation

    SB1070 is only enforcing the federal law when it comes to ILLEGAL immigration. You see the words in caps? ILLEGAL. Arizona is not against immigration, it’s against ILLEGAL immigration.
    Why should those who are actually on the waiting list to be legal residents, be bypassed by those who break the law to come here illegally and get treated as if we the people of the United States owe them something? Why should those who break the law be coveted and protected by rights activists and bleeding heart liberals, when those who are trying to do things the right way, the legal way, be shunned and discarded when they become LEGAL residents? Where is your trumpeting call for fairness then?

    Those of you who are against SB1070 and live in Arizona, can do the state a favor and move out of here. Go to your beloved California and stay there.

    Oh wait…you don’t want to move to California? Because California is a black hole of ignorance, corruption, high cost of living, has illegal immigrants draining the benefits system, and has massive high debt? Well then, that’s too bad, as you seem to think California is perfect with their lax enforcement on federal law on illegal immigration. You harpers who cry foul now, will be crying foul when the growing violence from Mexico spills over into the state.

    To those bands and performers who are part of the Sound Strike, you should be ashamed, because as professional artists, you should be keeping your personal political feelings out of your professional job. Feel free to have your personal opinions, but keep them out of your profession.

    Most fans don’t care what you personally think about laws and regulations of the states you don’t reside in.

    They want to hear your music and only music. It’s what made you famous in the first place is it not?

     Not your opinion on law or illegal immigration.

    If you want to keep on boycotting a state that has thousands of music fans, that’s fine. Just goes to show you that you are no longer for the people with your music, but for those who break the law and your own political bias butt.

  • Anon

    Not only is this history inaccurate, even the partial truths are stated in a way to sway the reader into believing that it is only the state of Arizona that has ever committed any atrocities.  It’s shameful, really.  I have used my voice to vote against those who are in power here, but they continue to win elections.  They are voted into office by people who have no idea who any of these bands boycotting even are.  I still do my part to try to change the things that I see that are wrong in this state.  I write letters.  I make phone calls.  I send emails.  They do not listen.  All that this boycott does is punish those of us who are fans.  Of course, if I’m completely honest, I should say “were” fans.  Because this boycott singled out the state of Arizona and has no effect whatsoever on any changes to SB1070, I am hereby boycotting every artist listed on this site.  Since you have apparently forgotten that by doing this, you are also boycotting those of us who work hard to make changes in this state, I will no longer spend my hard-earned money to support any of you.  

    • The Sound Strike

      What is inaccurate? And yes you are right, they won’t listen. So other steps were necessary. No one means to punish fans. That is a regrettable consequence, but a step that needed to be taken. Sorry for the inconvenience.